FAS 133 Option Fair Value Hedges: Financial-Engineering and
Financial-Accounting Perspectives
July 2001
Not The FAS 133 Cash Flow Hedge: Financial-Engineering, Finance, and
Financial-Accounting Perspectives
March 2001
Or “FAS 133-Induced Earnings Volatility, the
Time-Value Option Swap-related ‘Cost’ of FAS-133 and a Proposed Amendment to
the Rule
October 2000
James N.
Bodurtha, Jr.
Georgetown
November 29, 2001
FAS – 133
Derivative Hedges
“Short-Cut”
Rule
“Hedge Effectiveness” Tests for Forwards, Futures, …
”Fair-Value” balance sheet (market benchmarks)
Options
Generally, Intrinsic Value assigned
to hedge
Option Value = Intrinsic Value + Time
Value
Fair-value hedges
Time value changes assigned to
earnings
Cash Flow hedges
Cash flow of exposure and hedge to
earnings
Time value changes assigned to OCI
(equity)
Scenarios
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short
Unrecognized Firm Commitment Forward Hedge (note FAS-52)
|
|
|
Currency Up |
Currency Down |
||
|
|
Account/Entries |
Debit |
Credit |
Debit |
Credit |
|
Current |
|
None |
None |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter 1 |
Forward receivable - B |
15.20 |
|
|
13.20 |
|
|
Gain/loss on hedge activity - I |
|
15.20 |
13.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/loss on hedge
activity – I |
15.20 |
|
|
13.20 |
|
|
Firm commitment – B |
|
15.20 |
13.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter 2 |
Forward receivable – B |
17.50 |
|
|
11.40 |
|
|
Gain/loss on hedge activity - I |
|
17.50 |
11.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/loss on hedge activity – I |
17.50 |
|
|
11.40 |
|
|
Firm commitment – B |
|
17.50 |
11.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S/T Equipment – B |
100.00 |
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
Firm Commitment – B |
32.70 |
|
|
24.60 |
|
|
Forward receivable – B |
|
32.70 |
24.60 |
|
|
|
Cash – B |
|
100.00 |
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold – I |
100.00 |
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
S/T Equipment – B |
|
100.00 |
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts are identified as I-income statement
and B-balance statement.. |
|||||
Short Unrecognized Firm Commitment Option Hedge
|
|
|
Currency Up |
Currency Down |
||
|
|
Account |
Debit |
Credit |
Debit |
Credit |
|
Current |
Call purchase - B |
$5.20 |
|
$5.20 |
|
|
|
Cash - B |
|
$5.20 |
|
$5.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter 1 |
Call intrinsic value - B |
15.20 |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Gain/loss on hedge activity - I |
|
15.20 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/loss on hedge activity - I |
15.20 |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Firm commitment - B |
|
15.20 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call time value - B |
|
5.40 |
|
5.20 |
|
|
Loss on hedging - I |
5.40 |
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter 2 |
Call intrinsic value - B |
17.50 |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Gain/loss on hedge activity - I |
|
17.50 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/loss on hedge activity - I |
17.50 |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Firm commitment - B |
|
17.50 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call time value - B |
0.20 |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Gain on hedging - I |
|
0.20 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash - B |
32.70 |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Call receivable - B |
|
32.70 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S/T Equipment - B |
100.00 |
|
75.40 |
|
|
|
Firm Commitment - B |
32.70 |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Call receivable - B |
|
32.70 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
Cash - B |
|
100.00 |
|
75.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold - I |
100.00 |
|
75.40 |
|
|
|
S/T Equipment - B |
|
100.00 |
|
75.40 |
The key differences between
the forward and option fair value hedges are three:
1)
The
additional time value entries are necessary to expense the initial
“at-the-money” option premium, and the associated time value changes.
2)
The
declining Euro value leads to a much lower cost of goods sold.
3)
In
closing the first quarter, the call time value goes negative and the charge to
income is greater than the initial option premium. In
closing the second quarter, this negative time value provides a hedging
gain. This phenomenon can only occur
for a call option close to maturity on relatively high yielding underlying
(high interest rate foreign currency.)
4)
With
the forward hedge, the cost of goods sold was fixed, independent of changes in
currency values. In contrast, the
option hedge leads to different outcomes depending on changes in currency
values.
Concern is earnings
(time-value) variability induced by the option hedge that will be held to
maturity.
Figure 1
|
Spot Price Process Evolution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0.125 |
0.25 |
0.375 |
0.5 |
0.625 |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=5% |
|
|
|
|
|
Su6=
152.85 |
|
y=5% |
|
|
|
|
Su5=
142.41 |
|
|
s=20% |
|
|
|
Su4=
132.69 |
|
Su5d=
132.69 |
|
t=0.75 |
|
|
Su3
=123.63 |
|
Su4d=
123.63 |
|
|
h=0.125 |
|
Su2=
115.19 |
|
Su3d=
115.19 |
|
Su4d2=
115.19 |
|
|
Su=
107.33 |
|
Su2d=
107.33 |
|
Su3d2=
107.33 |
|
|
S0=
100.00 |
|
Sud=
100.00 |
|
Su2d2=
100.00 |
|
Su3d3=
100.00 |
|
|
Sd=
93.17 |
|
Sud2=
93.17 |
|
Su2d3=
93.17 |
|
|
|
|
Sd2=
86.81 |
|
Sud3=
86.81 |
|
Su2d4=
86.81 |
|
|
|
|
Sd3=
80.89 |
|
Sud4=
80.89 |
|
|
u=1.073 |
=exp(s*sqrt(h)) |
|
|
Sd4=
75.36 |
|
Sud5=
75.36 |
|
d=0.932 |
=exp(-s*sqrt(h)) |
|
|
|
Sd5=
70.22 |
|
|
Sumdn=S0*um*dn |
|
|
|
|
|
Sd6=
65.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 2
Call
Option Value Process Evolution
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0.125 |
0.25 |
0.375 |
0.5 |
0.625 |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p=48.23% |
=(e-(r-y)*t-d)/(u-d) |
|
|
|
Cu6= 52.85 |
=Max(Su6-X,0) |
|
|
Cundm=e-r*t*(p*Cun+1dm+(1-p)*Cundm+1) |
|
|
Cu5= 42.15 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Cu4= 32.28 |
|
Cu5d= 32.69 |
=Max(Su5d-X,0) |
|
|
|
|
Cu3= 23.19 |
|
Cu4d= 23.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cu2= 15.74 |
|
Cu3d= 15.00 |
|
Cu4d2= 15.19 |
=Max(Su4d2-X,0) |
|
|
Cu= 10.20 |
|
Cu2d= 8.99 |
|
Cu3d2= 7.28 |
|
|
|
C0=6.377 |
|
Cud= 5.17 |
|
Cu2d2= 3.49 |
|
Cu3d3= 0.00 |
=Max(Su3d3-X,0) |
|
|
Cd= 2.89 |
|
Cud2= 1.67 |
|
Cu2d3= 0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cd2= 0.80 |
|
Cud2= 0.00 |
|
Cu2d4= 0.00 |
=Max(Su2d4-X,0) |
|
|
|
|
Cd3= 0.00 |
|
Cud4= 0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cd4= 0.00 |
|
Cud5= 0.00 |
=Max(Sud5-X,0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cd5= 0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cd6= 0.00 |
=Max(Sd6-X,0) |
Figure 3
|
Option Time Value (T) and
Intrinsic Value (I) Process Evolution |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0.125 |
0.25 |
0.375 |
0.5 |
0.625 |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tumdn=Cumdn-Max(Sumdn-X,0) |
|
|
|
|
0.00
=Tu6 |
|
|
Iumdn=Max(Sumdn-X,0) |
|
|
|
|
-0.26
=Tu5 |
52.85 =Iu6 |
|
|
|
|
|
-0.41
=Tu4 |
42.41 =Iu5 |
0.00
=Tu5d |
|
|
|
|
-0.44
=Tu3 |
32.69 =Iu4 |
-0.15
=Tu4d |
32.69 =Iu5d |
|
|
|
0.55
=Tu2 |
23.63 =Iu3 |
-0.19
=Tu3d |
23.63 =Iu4d |
0.00
=Tu4d2 |
|
|
2.88
=Tu |
15.19 =Iu2 |
1.66
=Tu2d |
15.19 =Iu3d |
-0.05
=Tu3d2 |
15.19 =Iu4d2 |
|
6.377
=T0 |
7.33 =Iu |
5.17
=Tud |
7.33 =Iu2d |
3.49
=Tu2d2 |
7.33 =Iu3d2 |
0.00
=Tu3d3 |
|
0.00 =I0 |
2.89
=Td |
0.00 =Iud |
1.67
=Tud2 |
0.00 =Iu2d2 |
0.00
=Tu2d3 |
0.00 =Iu3d3 |
|
|
0.00 =Id |
0.80
=Td2 |
0.00 =Iud2 |
0.00
=Tud3 |
0.00 =Iu2d3 |
0.00
=Tu2d4 |
|
|
|
0.00 =Id2 |
0.00
=Td3 |
0.00 =Iud3 |
0.00
=Tud4 |
0.00 =Iu2d4 |
|
|
|
|
0.00 =Id3 |
0.00
=Td4 |
0.00 =Iud4 |
0.00
=Tud5 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 =Id4 |
0.00
=Td5 |
0.00 =Iud5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 =Id5 |
0.00
=Td6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 =Id6 |
Figure 4
|
Risk-Neutral Probabilities of Occurance and Associated
Changes in Option Time Value |
|
|||||
|
(that would
be booked to quarterly earnings under FAS 133) |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.26%
* 0.41=Tu6-Tu4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.41% * 0.19=Tu5d-Tu3d |
|
|
|
|
|
5.41%
* -0.95=Tu4-Tu2 |
8.70%
* -3.49=Tu4d2-Tu2d2 |
||
|
|
|
|
11.62%
* -5.36=Tu3d-Tud |
6.23%
* 0.00=Tu3d3-Tud3 |
||
|
|
23.26% * -5.83=Tu2-T0 |
6.23%
* 2.69=Tu2d2-Td2 |
1.67%
* 0.00=Tu2d4-Td4 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.70%
* 0.41=Tu5d-Tu4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.60%
* 0.19=Tu4d2-Tu3d |
|
|
|
|
|
11.62%
* -0.74=Tu3d-Tu2 |
18.68%
* -3.49=Tu3d3-Tu2d2 |
||
|
|
|
|
24.94%
* -1.68=Tu2d2-Tud |
13.37%
* 0.00=Tu2d4-Tud3 |
||
|
|
49.94% * -1.21=Tud-T0 |
13.38%
* -0.80=Tud3-Td2 |
3.59%
* 0.00=Tud5-Td4 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.45%
* 0.41=Tu4d2-Tu4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.23%
* 0.19=Tu3d3-Tu3d |
|
|
|
|
|
6.23%
* 2.94=Tu2d2-Tu2 |
10.02%
* -3.49=Tu2d4-Tu2d2 |
||
|
|
|
|
13.38%
* -5.17=Tud3-Tud |
7.17%
* 0.00=Tud5-Tud3 |
||
|
|
26.80% * -5.58=Td2-T0 |
7.18%
* -0.80=Td4-Td2 |
1.92%
* 0.00=Td6-Td4 |
|||
|
Expected Values = |
|
-3.454 |
|
-1.684 |
|
-1.240 |
|
Fair
value = Discounted Expected Values = |
-3.411 |
|
-1.642 |
|
-1.194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value = Discounted Expected Time Value Changes =
-6.247 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The path-dependent
time-value evolution is noted as Tundm-Tuidj, that indicates the time value
change associated with a spot price move from Suidj to Sundm
Simple Example

Figure 5
|
Value of $1 Contingent on Particular Changes in Option
Time Value |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0121 if Tu6 from Tu4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0521 if Tu5d from Tu3d |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0528 if Tu4 from Tu2 |
0.0838 if Tu4d2 from
Tu2d2 |
||
|
|
|
|
0.1133 if Tu3d from Tud |
0.0600 if Tu3d3 from
Tud3 |
||
|
|
0.2298 if Tu2 from T0 |
0.0608 if Tu2d2 from
Td2 |
0.0161 if Tu2d4 from
Td4 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0260 if Tu5d from Tu4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1118 if Tu4d2 from
Tu3d |
|
|
|
|
|
0.1133 if Tu3d from Tu2 |
0.1799 if Tu3d3 from
Tu2d2 |
||
|
|
|
|
0.2432 if Tu2d2 from
Tud |
0.1287 if Tu2d4 from
Tud3 |
||
|
|
0.4932 if Tud from T0 |
0.1305 if Tud3 from Td2 |
0.0345 if Tud5 from Td4 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0140 if Tu4d2 from
Tu4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0600 if Tu3d3 from
Tu3d |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0608 if Tu2d2 from
Tu2 |
0.0966 if Tu2d4 from
Tu2d2 |
||
|
|
|
|
0.1305 if Tud3 from Tud |
0.0691 if Tud5 from Tud3 |
||
|
|
0.2647 if Td2 from T0 |
0.0700 if Td4
from Td2 |
0.0185 if Td6
from Td4 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost across all outcomes = |
0.9876 |
|
0.9753 |
|
0.9632 |
|
|
(Discounted value of $1 in all outcomes) |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 6

Figure 7
|
Forward Price Contingent Cashflows of a Fixed Option
Time Value Cash Flow Swap |
|
|||||
|
[forward time value rebate - fixed (swap) +
option (@ maturity)] |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(-0.42 - 2.179)*1.26% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(-0.20 - 2.179)*5.41% |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.98 - 2.179)*5.41% |
(3.62 - 2.179)*8.70% |
||
|
|
|
|
(0.00 - 2.179)*11.62% |
(0.00 - 2.179)*6.23% |
||
|
|
(5.90 - 2.179)*23.26% |
(-2.76 - 2.179)*6.23% |
(0.00 - 2.179)*1.67% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(-0.42 - 2.179)*2.70% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(-0.20 - 2.179)*11.60% |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.76 - 2.179)*11.62% |
(3.62 - 2.179)*18.68% |
||
|
|
|
|
(1.72 - 2.179)*24.94% |
(0.00 - 2.179)*13.37% |
||
|
|
(1.22 - 2.179)*49.94% |
(0.82 - 2.179)*13.38% |
(0.00 - 2.179)*3.59% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(-0.42 - 2.179)*1.45% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(-0.20 - 2.179)*6.23% |
|
|
|
|
|
(-3.02 - 2.179)*6.23% |
(3.62 - 2.179)*10.02% |
||
|
|
|
|
(5.30 - 2.179)*13.38% |
(0.00 - 2.179)*7.17% |
||
|
|
(5.65 - 2.179)*26.80% |
(0.82 - 2.179)*7.18% |
(0.00 - 2.179)*1.92% |
|||
|
RN
Expected Values = |
1.318 |
|
-0.453 |
|
-0.892 |
|
|
Discounted
RN Expected Values = |
1.301 |
|
-0.442 |
|
-0.859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted RN Expected Value of Net Time Value Rebate
less Swap Payment (2.179) = 0.000 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.c. A General Case
3)
Sequence of
time value changes has the following discounted risk-neutral measure expected
value:
4)
As
,
and set
.
5)
In most cases, this total
cost of time-value changes will be negative.
In the case of zero interest rates, this quantity is current option time
value. In cases with no underlying
yield, higher rates lower this cost.
With a yield on the underlying, then the sign of the cost is
undetermined (though for most cases the cost remains positive.) In the usual cases that longer maturity
and/or higher volatility raise option values, then the cost of option
time-value changes will also rise.
“Fixing” FAS-133 Induced
Option Time Value Changes
Define forward
time value change

6)
7)
Time Value Swap (TVS) payment value is the root, V.
Other
Section 2.b.2 variable TVS set each quarter smoothes time-value changes and doesn’t require FAS-133.
3)
Accounting perspective -
Look to held – to – maturity bonds,
principal like intrinsic value, time value could be amortized like bond
discount or premium over option life.
Paritally done with DIG G20 for some cash flow hedges
Appendix – Value and
expected value changes
(literally, minding p’s and q’s.)
|
Changes in Call Option Fair Value and Expected
Value |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.74 =
Cu2 |
9.36=Cu2-C0 |
|
|
6.377 = C0 |
|
5.17 =
Cud |
-1.21=Cud-C0 |
|
|
|
|
0.80 =
Cd2 |
-5.58=Cd2-C0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.23 =
ECu2 |
9.89=ECu2-EC0 |
|
|
8.345 = EC0 |
|
6.42 =
ECud |
-1.93=ECud-EC0 |
|
|
|
|
1.09 =
ECd2 |
-7.25=ECd2-EC0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge Effectiveness |
|
5.6% in u2 |
||
|
(% of expected value change) |
59.5% in ud |
|||
|
|
30.1% in d2 |
|||
Finesse to time value change in OCI won’t generally be “effective.”
Methodology – Linking objective and risk-neutral probabilities
annualized expected
logarithmic change in the underlying price a-1)
Cox-Ross-Rubinstein (1976)
and Rubinstein (1976) implicitly use this specification,
. For this case,
and
.
is an unbiased risk
premium estimate.
for a = 0, equals risk-neutral probability, p.
a-8)
For underlying valuation (fixed risk premium and volatility), may use either valuation measure/probabilities.
|
Table A-1 Spot
outcomes |
# of paths to
outcome |
Risk neutral
probability of outcome |
True probability of
outcome |
|
152.8 |
1 |
1.26% |
1.93% |
|
132.7 |
2 |
8.11% |
10.76% |
|
115.2 |
15 |
21.76% |
25.07% |
|
100.0 |
20 |
31.13% |
31.13% |
|
86.8 |
15 |
25.06% |
21.75% |
|
75.4 |
6 |
10.76% |
8.10% |
|
65.4 |
1 |
1.92% |
1.26% |
|
Expected Value |
|
100 |
103.05 |
|
Add 5% Yield |
|
103.05 |
106.98 |
|
Discounted value |
@ Risk neutral rate =5% |
100 |
N/A |
|
Discounted
value |
@
Risk-adjusted rate = 9% |
N/A |
100 |
4% risk
premium, a, as m = 7%, s = 20%, r= 5%;
, expected return – continuously compounded risk-adjusted
rate.
Option Expected Values
a-8)
B[ ] is the complementary
binomial distribution; “a stands for the minimum number of upward moves the
stock must make over the next n periods for the call to finish in-the-money (a
will be the smallest nonnegative integer such that
);”[1]
and
.[2]
Following Rubinstein (1976) and allowing the number of periods, n, to
go to infinity (h to go to zero), we have
, a-9)
where N is the standard
normal distribution, and 
Figure A-1
|
Delta Hedge Process Evolution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0.125 |
0.25 |
0.375 |
0.5 |
0.625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dundm=exp(-y*h)*(Cun+1dm-Cundm+1)/(Sun+1dm-Sundm+1) |
|
Du5=0.994 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Du4=0.988 |
|
|
|
|
|
Du3=0.981 |
|
Du4d=0.994 |
|
|
|
Du2=0.866 |
|
Du3d=0.988 |
|
|
|
Du=0.692 |
|
Du2d=0.753 |
|
Du3d2=0.994 |
|
D0=0.513 |
|
Dud=0.513 |
|
Du2d2=0.511 |
|
|
|
Dd=0.329 |
|
Dud2=0.263 |
|
Du2d3=0.000 |
|
|
|
Dd2=0.135 |
|
Dud3=0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dd3=0.000 |
|
Dud4=0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dd4=0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dd5=0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure A-2
|
Option Elasticity Process Evolution |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0.125 |
0.25 |
0.375 |
0.5 |
0.625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eundm=Dundm*Sundm/Cundm |
|
|
|
eu5=3.358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
eu4=4.059 |
|
|
|
|
|
eu3=5.232 |
|
eu4d=5.232 |
|
|
|
eu2=6.337 |
|
eu3d=7.583 |
|
|
|
eu=7.275 |
|
eu2d=8.994 |
|
eu3d2=14.648 |
|
e0=8.052 |
|
eud=9.936 |
|
eu2d2=14.648 |
|
|
|
ed=10.609 |
|
eud2=14.648 |
|
#N/A |
|
|
|
ed2=14.648 |
|
#N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
#N/A |
|
#N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
#N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#N/A |
Figure A-3
|
Risk-adjusted Discount Rate Process Evolution under
the True-Objective-Q Measure |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
Risk premium=a= |
4.00% |
|
|
|
|
Risk-adjusted underlying discount rate=er=a+r= |
9.00% |
|
|
||
|
|
rundm=ln
(eundm (eer*h-er*h)+er*h)/h |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0.125 |
0.25 |
0.375 |
0.5 |
0.625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ru5=18.35% |
|
|
|
|
|
ru4=21.11% |
|
|
|
|
|
ru3=25.71% |
|
ru4d=25.71% |
|
|
|
ru2=30.02% |
|
ru3d=34.84% |
|
|
|
ru=33.65% |
|
ru2d=40.28% |
|
ru3d2=61.68% |
|
r0=36.65% |
|
rud=43.88% |
|
ru2d2=61.68% |
|
|
|
rd=46.45% |
|
rud2=61.68% |
|
#N/A |